Every property, every tenancy, every certificate — in one place.
The expensive thing in this business isn't chasing rent. It's a gas certificate nobody was watching. We build the system that holds every property, tenancy and deadline.
This is a capability page, not a claim of published client work in this industry. Examples show workflows ASLM can assess; requirements, existing tools and domain responsibilities are confirmed before any proposal.
Sound familiar?
- Rent received against rent expected is a reconciliation, not a number.
- Maintenance is a WhatsApp thread and nobody can say what you agreed.
- Getting your portfolio into a shape a lender will look at takes a week.
What changes
What we build for property & real estate.
Never miss a certificate again
Every date tracked against every property, with alerts that get louder as they get closer.
Arrears surface in week one
Expected against received, matched from bank data, instead of a month-end reconciliation.
The whole property in one file
Agreements, deposits, works and correspondence together, not spread across four systems.
A lender-ready picture in minutes
Occupancy, yield, voids and exposure straight from live data, not assembled for the meeting.
Worth knowing
The deadlines are the product.
Most property software sells you a database. What actually costs you money is a date nobody was watching — a gas certificate that lapsed, a deposit not protected in time. Every one of those is knowable months ahead. They get missed because they live in a spreadsheet someone has to remember to open.
Where we stand on proof
No property build published yet. What transfers is deadline-and-evidence engineering: software where a date is a legal obligation and the record behind it has to survive being asked for. A certificate that quietly expires is that problem wearing different clothes.
See the work →Before you ask
Property & real estate: straight answers.
If one fits, buy it. Building earns its place when you have an unusual portfolio shape — mixed HMO and single lets, multiple entities, an in-house maintenance team — that the products only handle with workarounds, or when the reporting you need for a lender simply is not in them.
Usually. Open banking gives read-only access to most UK business accounts, which is what makes automatic rent matching possible, and the mainstream accounting packages have supported routes in.
They will — the Renters' Rights Act alone reshapes several of them. That is a design requirement, not a surprise: the obligations are held as configuration rather than baked into code, so a rule change is an edit rather than a rebuild.
Yes, and it is a common shape. The usual answer is a system that holds the whole portfolio with different visibility for managed and self-managed properties, so the board-level view is complete even where the day-to-day is not yours.
Where to go next
Also built for: Financial services & wealth · Home building & trades · Legal