When the booking system doesn't talk to anything else.
You've got a booking system, a till and a rota, and they don't talk to each other. We join them up, so you can see which shifts actually make money.
This is a capability page, not a claim of published client work in this industry. Examples show workflows ASLM can assess; requirements, existing tools and domain responsibilities are confirmed before any proposal.
Sound familiar?
- You find out a site had a bad month when the accounts arrive.
- Rotas are built on instinct, which is expensive when it is wrong on a Saturday.
- Reviews land in four places and nobody owns replying.
What changes
What we build for hospitality & dining.
One set of numbers everyone trusts
Covers, spend per head and labour cost in a single view instead of three exports.
See the bad week during the week
Which sites and which shifts make money, every week, not once the accounts arrive.
Roster to the covers you'll actually get
Staffing built from your own history, with the manager keeping the final say.
Never miss a review again
Feedback routed to whoever owns it, and the slow drift in sentiment visible early.
Worth knowing
You probably don't need new software.
You need the systems you're already paying for to agree with each other. That's unglamorous work, and most suppliers would rather sell you another platform than do it. So we start with a map: what talks, what doesn't, and what your supplier has locked shut. You get that map even if you build nothing.
Where we stand on proof
No hospitality build published yet. What transfers is integration: joining systems never designed to talk to each other, which is the whole problem when the booking system, the till and the rota each hold a different version of the same night.
See the work →Before you ask
Hospitality & dining: straight answers.
Most will — the mainstream platforms have supported interfaces. Some suppliers genuinely lock the door, and where that is true we will tell you early rather than bill you to discover it. That answer takes days, not months.
Probably, for the full picture. A single site usually gets more from one specific thing — the rota, or the ordering, or the reporting — done properly. The reporting layer starts earning its keep at the point where you cannot walk every floor yourself.
In one place clearly: forecasting covers from your own history, which is genuinely hard by eye. Elsewhere it is mostly decoration, and the version without a model is cheaper and more predictable. We will say which is which.
We work alongside it. This is not a proposal to replace the systems you have — it is the layer that makes them agree, which is usually the cheaper and far less disruptive answer.